Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Henshall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 23:06, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Chris Henshall

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I do not believe this person is notable. None of the positions he allegedly held (the article is a wholly unverified BLP) confer automatic notability, and a Google News search does not produce anything of importance. This article from the Yorkshire Post is not about the man himself and mentions him only once, and this article, from Times Higher Education, only has a few sentences on him. Neither of these (and that's all I could find) give us much to base an article on, and I don't believe that this is enough coverage for the subject to pass general notability guidelines. Drmies (talk) 19:32, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Unreferenced BLP which fails WP:PROF even taking everything in it at face value EEng (talk) 23:22, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. His administrative position in academia is not at a high enough level to pass WP:PROF, so we are forced to rely instead on WP:GNG, but there doesn't seem to be enough there either. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:15, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:RS and WP:BIO. --Monterey Bay (talk) 04:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.