Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Hewitt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  14:19, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Chris Hewitt

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Previously considered here and left for cleanup; whereas the band's article is now defensible, this article has not been improved and remains sourced only by himself; outside the context of Tractor (band) and running some festivals in the 1970s, he does not appear to be notable. Rodhull andemu  22:23, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Agreed, this article is purely used to serve Chris Hewitt's tenuous links to the music industry, and any attempts to include verifiable truths (which are justifiably negative about Hewitt's business practices) about this man are simply removed (by the man himself) and replaced with more, shall we say, favourable text. 21:04, 1 December 2008 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.237.131.64 (talk • contribs)
 * The object of this discussion is not to insult the man himself, however strongly you may feel about him; it is to decide whether he is notable enough to have an article here. Thanks. -- Rodhull andemu  21:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, the equivalent would be having a Wiki page for one of the stage crew at Woodstock (although that in itself isn't strictly accurate as Woodstock was a globally newsworthy event!). The man is fond of self-publicity, and that is why he created his own Wikipedia page.  Surely an article on a stage technician from small-town rural English festivals 30 years ago do not warrant a place on this valuable resource of information?  16:00 4 December 2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.237.131.64 (talk) 16:00, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 03:28, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 03:28, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 03:28, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:53, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

a week. Let it be recreated if notability is established, but in thirty years, it hasn't happened yet. -- Rodhull andemu  01:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Nobody cares; nobody is defending inclusion and it's been on relevant projects for
 * Delete. No reliable independent sources have been presented (nor could I find any) to assert notability. Icemotoboy (talk) 02:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: notability not established, as per WP:MUSIC. JamesBurns (talk) 05:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.