Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Klein-Beekman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Canal Hotel bombing. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:18, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Chris Klein-Beekman

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No notability. Kraxler (talk) 20:03, 2 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Note to closing admin This AfD nomination was malformed and was never transcluded in the daily deletion log. I have refactored it, and will now add it to the log, please consider the AfD as running from the time of this comment for purposes of deciding when to close it. Monty  845  21:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 11 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:23, 17 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - Some sources:
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 17:19, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 17:19, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 17:19, 18 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - We know these sources, they are listed in the article. That's still no indication of notability. Just being mentioned twice in the news is certainly not enough. Kraxler (talk) 00:26, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The sources I presented were not in the article at the time of its nomination; I added them afterward. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:24, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Addendum to nomination – See What Wikipedia is not; I quote: "Subjects of encyclopedia articles must satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirements. Wikipedia is not the place to memorialize deceased friends, relatives, acquaintances, or others who do not meet such requirements." Kraxler (talk) 21:52, 24 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Canal Hotel bombing - WP:BIO1E "...the degree of significance of the individual's role within [a newsworthy event] should be considered... When the role played by an individual in the event is less significant, an independent article may not be needed, and a redirect is appropriate." ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 02:25, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:51, 26 May 2012 (UTC)




 * Redirect to Canal Hotel Bombing  I do not think that this page would have been made if such person hadn't of died. Also agree that lacks notability and somewhat violates the 'Wikipedia is not...a memorial site. User Talk:W.D. 09:03, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above. To put it somewhat bluntly, getting blown up does not make one notable. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 16:56, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.