Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Martin (boxing trainer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) ‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ – 2 . O . Boxing  11:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Chris Martin (boxing trainer)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG. BEFORE search only provided three sources that could be argued as SIGCOV (all written after his death); this is written by the article creator, so doesn't do much to establish notability; this is the strongest, but doesn't really offer much to base an article on (he was well respected, he trained X, people liked him, etc.); this is just a reword of the i.stuff article. All other sources I found were the same kind of passing mentions as what's currently used in the article. – 2 . O . Boxing  11:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Boxing,  and New Zealand.  2 . O . Boxing  11:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep Even though a lot of the articles are just mentions, there is significant amount of articles which i believe meets GN. On top of that A couple things that are missed that significant coverage including, . On top of that if you see here , you can see how much coverage Martin got surrounding his death and working with David Tua from local newspapers across New Zealand.Bennyaha (talk) 11:27, 29 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Withdraw: The depth of coverage provided above isn't the best, but it's a whole lot more than what I found, which leads me to believe there's probably more. Good effort Benny. – 2 . O . Boxing  11:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.