Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Mason (journalist) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ミラP 16:42, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Chris Mason (journalist)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously deleted as not meeting WP:JOURNALIST; there are a few new sources in this version but they seem trivial. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 19:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 19:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 19:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:36, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. Mason has played a major role in presenting an increasingly popular BBC One political show and I believe he warrants an article. Brexitcast has been the primary subject of multiple articles and reviews and Mason has received periodical media coverage because of his part in it. Andysmith248 (talk) 10:32, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep important journalist.Strandvue (talk) 11:56, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
 * But do the sources show notability? IlluminatingTrooper (talk) 02:29, 22 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep as a journalist subject worth keeping.User:Hildreth gazzard (talk) 05:04, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Per WP:ILIKEIT that is not an argument to show why it should be kept. Please discount the above vote closers. IlluminatingTrooper (talk) 02:29, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - two of the sources in the article are interviews, which are primary sources - the rest of the references are run-of-the-mill for someone on TV - there is no in depth coverage of Mason himself - has not won any awards or made a widely recognized contribution per WP:ANYBIO - has not received significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources per WP:BASIC - just having a job with the BBC is not in itself notable - Epinoia (talk) 04:20, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep ... Major political journalist who will be even more significant  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.2.22.134 (talk) 03:00, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 13:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Delete Sources are WP:PRIMARY or not in depth as mentioned above. Wikipedia is WP:NOT a crystal ball site so we can't say he will warrant an article in the future but we can say right now there is nothing really to show this article satisfies WP:GNG. IlluminatingTrooper (talk) 02:29, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep He presents a political discussion programme shown on BBC One and does so in addition to his role as a political reporter for BBC News. The article also contains several independent references from a number of different sources. Rillington (talk) 14:15, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:30, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete The washington post source does discuss him a little, not a lot, but it is barely enough to be significant. All the rest are either interviews with him or otherwise insignificant. Rockphed (talk) 15:01, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Other news media, in Britain and internationally (US, France, Ireland so far), have reported on his reports - particularly about the Mr Blobby quote, but the Express and the Evening Standard have reported about him on other occasions too. An academic study of tweets by "seasoned UK political correspondents" included Mason as one of its 10 subjects. This is not a regional news broadcaster - he reports on national news about major political events, and receives attention from other news media for doing so. I have added some sources and info to the article, and will look for more. I note that some of the sources include interviews, but they also have information about Mason, so should not be rejected entirely. RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:46, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * While I haven't looked at all of your sources (and I would appreciate a WP:THREE list of what you think the best 3 are), most of the sources seem to be about the one incident, which would mean this fails WP:BLP1E. Rockphed (talk) 11:33, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Ridiculous suggestion to delete. He's frequently on the BBC and is therefore well-known and notable. If the article lacks sources then go and find some! 31.52.161.37 (talk) 22:19, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per Rillington.4meter4 (talk) 19:28, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep He is a political journalist who is regularly making quality broadcasts on BBC News. He was one of the founders of Brexitcast where the other founders are on Wikipedia. He would not be that well known outside Europe .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by UKpoliticaljunkie (talk • contribs) 20:00, 4 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.