Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris McJesus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. PeaceNT 08:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Chris McJesus

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

None of the references demonstrate notability. Alksub 01:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources to establish notability. Sounds like a hoax. -- Hdt 83   Chat 02:10, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks reliable sources on the internet. (Search for "Chris McJesus" -wikipedia returns only 5 results, most of them are blogs). Also, the name of "Chris McJesus" sounds a bit to similar to Jesus Christ, don't you think? Like to be a hoax as well.--Alasdair 02:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Book is for sale on Amazon, so it's not a hoax. I'm sure the choice of pseudonym was intentional, but not relevant to notability.Horrorshowj 03:05, 29 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Author of a single book published by a vanity press, with no other notability claimed or established. Deor 02:24, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks sources. NHRHS2010  Talk  02:41, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack of references online is bad for something this recent. Not finding any reviews of the author's 1 book online. Book isn't notable, and there's nothing to indicate separate notability for the author.  Notified article creator of AfD. Horrorshowj 03:05, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable.  Cheers,JetLover 03:12, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no reliable sources to establish notabillity. Oysterguitarist 04:55, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete (Can somebody close this per WP:SNOW)? Anywho, no sources, no notability, no verification, and is likely a hoax.-- Pre ston  H  04:59, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --EAEB 14:35, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This article violates WP:OR too. I don't see any reason to keep it.--NAHID 19:59, 29 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.