Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris McLaughlin (sports broadcaster)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  18:47, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Chris McLaughlin (sports broadcaster)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

When attempting to find sources for this unreferenced BLP I discovered that the subject...exists and really nothing else. I see no legitimate claim to notability in simply being a sports journalist. If he had won awards, written books, or something it would be a different story but unless someone uncovers something that I missed the article should be deleted. J04n(talk page) 03:20, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 11 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. First thought on seeing this was that he should probably be notable, but the sources don't even come close to showing it at present. Recreate if and when. Alzarian16 (talk) 00:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails notability tests at WP:GNG. Pburka (talk) 15:33, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 'Comment I tend to agree that he's not notable. On the other hand, I don't see any evidence that there was a PROD that someone removed, or that the article's creator, User:Marks87, was made aware that this was nominated for deletion.   Hence, I'm not sure that one can make a fair ruling on this. Mandsford 23:10, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.