Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Noonan (Chief Trade Adviser)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The article has been improved since nominated. If the issues that support deletion still remain, this can always be renominated. (non-admin closure)  Ya  sh  !   06:19, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Chris Noonan (Chief Trade Adviser)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual. Does not meet WP:GNG. Does not have significant coverage across multiple WP:RS Zpeopleheart (talk) 20:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete No RS, not much information at all. Only one day old, but if editor is serious this should be done in draft space. LaMona (talk) 19:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  18:44, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  18:44, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Clearly fails GNG and SIGCOV. DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 03:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep appear to meet notability criteria. I have updated the article - he is cited in NZ and Australian media, is well published, and holds a signficant academic position. The initial article did not do him credit NealeFamily (talk) 02:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The way the article now stands, there's enough evidence for notability.  Schwede 66  18:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:11, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep As per WP:ATD editing to improve the page is preferable to deletion. The examples added in show that with editing the page can make the cut. Markpackuk (talk) 12:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.