Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Owen Halper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Keep arguments have not been substantiated.  Ty  09:30, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Chris Owen Halper

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A photographer whose photos have verifiably been used by a maker of camera bags (as have the photos of many other photographers) but whose other claims to significance are unsupported. The article was created by an SPA a year ago, hasn't been significantly improved since, and doesn't seem likely to be improved any time soon. Hoary (talk) 04:13, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.   —David Eppstein (talk) 15:56, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Seems to meet notability criteria, but could be improved and better referenced. Pinkville (talk) 15:57, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep He seems notable, but it needs some sources. Voyaging(talk) 19:13, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, lots of professional photographers routinely photograph somewhat notable subjects, but this does not confer notability onto the photographer. The mention of Mensa membership hints that this article is self-promotion. Truth be told, I don't even see much assertion of notability in the mostly unsourced text. Gwen Gale (talk) 23:04, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No proof of any significant recognition to meet WP:BIO. IFEA, Emergency Beacons, and Lowepro seem to be minor "in house" recognition. Some significant critical BIO or review is needed. Lack of sources means "delete" -- if such sources are added, can become a "keep". Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 18:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per several; a non-notable pro photographer. Not even an assertion of notability. Johnbod (talk) 02:12, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.