Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris R. Notarile


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 01:26, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Chris R. Notarile

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Independent film producer - as in, producer, actor, director, writer, shoe shine boy and so on in self-made films. Some perhaps reasonable, but none show evidence of commercial release, and there do not seem to be any proper independent sources. Guy (Help!) 11:44, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for now. Being a jack-of-all-trades doesn't make you notable.  If subject achieves notability at a later date (e.g., with commercial release of film), article could be reinstated.  Shouldn't this AfD also include Niki Notarile and Blinky Productions for the same reasons?  Possible walled garden in the works? --Nonstopdrivel 13:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, fails WP:V given that all his "fame" is from a single source, as well as WP:COI; take a look at the principal editor, whose sole Wiki activity is pushing this fellow. Niki Notarile's been nominated independently.   Ravenswing  14:01, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I was on the fence about this one, but none of the citations appear to be from reliable sources. MikeWazowski 14:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per JzG, RGT. Eusebeus 15:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per JzG. "[I]ndependant film" seems to be a euphemism for "home movies". --Calton | Talk 03:12, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per JzG. Just misses being a speedy candidate by having worked as an intern on some episodes of the TMNT series. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Marge to Blinky Productions Article--Brown Shoes22 22:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't be much point to that, it's up for AfD too and looks nearly certain to be deleted unless there's some kind of miracle from above. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.