Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Reid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:55, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Chris Reid
Delete. Non-notable candidate for city councillor in 2006 Toronto municipal elections. Fails to meet WP:BIO criteria. Atrian 02:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete City council members are inherently non-notable. A mere candidate even less so. Other accomplishments do not rise to the level which would warrant inclusion. --DarkAudit 02:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, DarkAudit took the words out of my mouth. -- Kinu t /c  02:10, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: An anti-sprawl candidate, like tens of thousands in the US and UK.  If he figures out a solution to sprawl that takes away the inherent power differential of money and tax base improvements and manages to get that plan enacted, he might be Man of the Year.  Until then, he's a contender, and I'm sure we wish him well.  Geogre 02:27, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * He's not so much anti-sprawl as he is NIMBY. And NIMBY candidates are a dime a dozen.  --Skeezix1000 18:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Absolutely. NIMBY could have a listcruft article generated from it that would be deleted for having an infinite set.  Geogre 18:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable candidate. Leading with an external link to ones campaign website also calls WP:AUTO into the mix.  Shameless Plug:  Moving over to Campaigns Wikia would be perfectly ok.  Not sure if there is a transwiki for that yet. &mdash; MrDolomite | Talk 03:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Gogo Dodo 04:07, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with DarkAudit. YUL89YYZ 17:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. --Skeezix1000 18:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Retain I think all challengers should be considered noteworthy. If they lose the election and do nothing else considered relevant, then their pages may be thrown into the trash heap of history. Juveboy 01:07, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. rootology 06:15, 29 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.