Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Remo

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedied by Starblind. android 79  14:27, September 2, 2005 (UTC)

Chris Remo
Delete A nn contributor to a website. A google search of "chris remo" shacknews returns 24 unique google hits. Most of the article's content would fall under hoax anyway. TM (talk) 08:23, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I've put up a speedy tag on the article since it was suggested during discussion. --TM (talk) 14:16, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

He is an official staffer at Shacknews.com who has a certain lore about him that is well seperated into a seperate section. Maybe the article should be LOCKED but not deleted. Since he does have a history of good stuff at idle thumbs, since it wasn't put up by shacknews officials, and since it is pretty clear what is goofy lore about Remo as it is seperated and what is fact, deletion would be wrong. Some of the related articles are junk and could be deleted, thats for sure. But the actual Chris Remo part should stay the same.

If anything, the now re-branded 'lore' section should be deleted and the article locked for a period.

I think the fable's of Chris Remo should be kept for future reference about the great man that is Chris Remo.

Yes he is a great guy but that is not the point of wikipedia. We don't need to infest this part of the internet with our diseases.


 * Delete. Not notable, hoax, attack page. android  79  11:26, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - This should've been speedied... ! UniReb 12:23, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy as hoax/nonsense. the wub  "?/!"  13:34, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedied it. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 14:35, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.