Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Rhoads


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete as your every day MySpace musician— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 08:29, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Chris Rhoads

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

In my opinion, doesn't assert sufficient notability. Lack of references and sources, as well.  Daniel Bryant  07:39, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

KeepI saw him perform with Wynton Marsalis and Dave Samuels both grammy winners. So i think there is sufficient notability. just lackings in references and sources in my oppinion 74.195.240.49 17:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Ah, but there's the rub, no?  An article that is "just" lack in references and sources is a significant issue when there's no evidence that such references and sources (acceptable per WP:ATT) exist and can be retrieved. Mwelch 20:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete since this topic is not sufficiently well-known. Mr. Berry 07:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep As the author I see it as valuable information for those seeking it.    The topic is quite well-known to those in the industry.   Chazlewkowski 17:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Would you provide reasons for keeping the article that comply with Wikipedia policy? While everyone can understand that you subjectively feel the article is a keeper because you wrote it, we need objective discussion as to why the article's subject is notable as well as any factual statements being attributable. Thanks, Scienter 13:44, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep 84.195.238.41 05:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 11:21, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete: This guy fails WP:MUSIC with flying colors; he doesn't remotely come close to fulfilling any of the criteria.  He's just a session musician, of which there are tens of thousands.  NB - all the Keep votes above, so far, are single-purpose accounts. Ravenswing 13:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The author asserts some notability, but there is no source in the article to back this claim up, nor have links been added in nearly a week since this AfD went up. Doesn't seem currently t pass WP:MUSIC StuartDouglas 14:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability per WP:MUSIC. Mwelch 20:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, too many Myspace sources. Realkyhick 22:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment:: well I already did my :*STRONG KEEP: However as the author it appears that the general vibe is to have this article deleted.  No hard feelings here, I understand why it would be questionable.  I personally feel as if it is  notable enough to be kept.  This is based on his reputation, many endorsers and list of artists he has recorded or performed with.  However I fully understand how those who arnt familiar would vote for Delete based on the quality of the article that I made.   Best of luck, hopefully the article stays but if not perhaps someone else will create a better one in the future. Chazlewkowski 04:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, the only reference is a list of artists that use said hardware. --Wirbelwind ヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 04:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: one of which being Chris Rhoads Chazlewkowski 08:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.