Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Rowley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  07:21, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Chris Rowley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NARTIST. Source says that this is his only piece of art, has only been an artist for a few years, cannot find any other sources that indicate awards or other notability Rogermx (talk) 01:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * There are other pieces in the Tempe/Mesa/Phoenix area including several local standpipes that have been tiled by Mr. Rowley and others. Having this entry allows local historians and scholars to know who is responsible for the massive 'The Tree' piece at the Phoenix Zoo. User:Bscolli —Preceding undated comment added 14:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not a storehouse of all knowledge for scholars or anyone else. However, it is possible that content about "The Tree" could be merged into the article about the zoo itself. Rogermx (talk) 02:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  19:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  19:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete one source is not enough to pass GNG, and we need more than just local feel good coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:57, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  06:32, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete As per the nomination. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 02:32, 4 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.