Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Sainty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Not all !votes here made strong policy-based arguments, but the added material does appear to be significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. —Ganesha811 (talk) 16:35, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Chris Sainty

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Appears to fail WP:GNG. Uhooep (talk) 00:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting to get an assessment on recent contributions to the article Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final Relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Wordsmith Talk to me 17:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bilateral relations.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete gets routine coverage as a government representative but nothing indepth to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 01:02, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * KEEP. I have added a para, which I hope establishes some level of notability. Roundtheworld (talk) 11:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * KEEP. I agree with @Roundtheworld this diplomat is quite well know, the article should remain open. Diogo Costa (talk) 12:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Being "quite well known" is not a notability criterion. LibStar (talk) 12:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.