Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Sawyer (footballer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Chris Sawyer (footballer)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable football (soccer) player. Only reference is a website which doesn't even mention him. Hut 8.5 15:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm not a footballer (or any kind of baller at all), but seeing as how his page has so little content, I'm guessing he is of little note and is just clutter. &mdash; Frecklefσσt | Talk 17:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Nowhere near notable enough. A 16 year old who has played 12 games at the tenth level of the English football league system. This is A7 material to me. --Dreaded Walrus t c 18:24, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Malcolmxl5 19:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - a long way from being notable. - fchd 20:07, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone else. ArtVandelay13 20:29, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Has not played in a fully professional league etc. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  22:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Liss Athletic F.C.? Uh, not notable. DWaterson 23:25, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Person is not, as of yet, notable. RFerreira 20:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above. Possible vanity article?  robwingfield «T•C» 23:31, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Quite possibly. See also for some other edits by this IP: , and  (which actually was quite a good set of edits, bar the unencyclopedic content introduced). --Dreaded Walrus t c 23:50, 9 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.