Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Sullo (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:58, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Chris Sullo
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SNG. Purely written for promotion. Article's author also wrote Nikto (vulnerability scanner) - subject closely related to the article in nomination. (Note: The author (User:Root exploit) also self-describes themselves as "Security Researcher" on their userpage). -- Wiki Linuz  ( talk ) 04:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Wiki Linuz   ( talk ) 04:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing, Internet, United States of America,  and Virginia.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:59, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can find no WP:SIGCOV of Sullo, only passing mentions of his role in creating Nikto. There's significant coverage here, but it's a blog and appears to be WP:SELFPUBLISHED. I also reviewed the discussion in the no-consensus 2006 and 2007 AfDs, and the "keep" votes were highly unpersuasive, rehearsing the WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS already in the article and making non-policy-based arguments for notability (such as a one-word "notable" and citing a "desperate wish" to keep the article). I would encourage other editors to review the sources and prior discussions carefully. If after 18 years(!) sufficient WP:SIGCOV in secondary, independent, reliable sources cannot be found, this article should not be kept. Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete and possibly Nikto (vulnerability scanner) probably should visit AFD as well. Neither of the previous AFDs have compelling arguments to keep; this article is just an abandoned resume. Walsh90210 (talk) 17:02, 15 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.