Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Wadlow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Enos733 (talk) 00:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Chris Wadlow

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Tagged for notability since 2012, and doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG or WP:ACADEMIC. Whisperjanes (talk) 06:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 06:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 06:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 06:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak keep per WP:AUTHOR and the multiple reviews of his two books that I just added to the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:24, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Certainly a notable academic in patent law. No Swan So Fine (talk) 14:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Seems to be a copyvio per Earwig, although the website it was copied from is now archived. May well qualify for WP:G12. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 07:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I got "18% - violation unlikely" on that link - has the article been cleaned up since? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  17:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , How bizarre! I now get a 4.8% unlikely, but it hasn't been changed at all. I'm pretty sure the link the tool flagged when I ran it was this archived official bio of Wadlow, which Earwig now doesn't seem to think is similar at all. Unclear what's going on. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep As per WP:AUTHOR. Pilean (talk) 07:06, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep As per WP:AuthorDavidstewartharvey (talk) 13:57, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.