Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Wooden


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 04:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Chris Wooden

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Asserts notability, but I can find no verifiable sources for claims of being pundit, being disliked by China, or being censured by Congress. Cannot find evidence of meeting WP:BIO.
 * Google search for Chris Wooden yeilded 56 UNIQUE hits. There are other "Chris Woodens" on the web.
 * Google search for "Christopher Wooden" yileded 52 UNIQUE hits. There are other "Christopher Wooden"s on the web.
 * Google News gave me 9 hits about other "Christopher Wooden"s.
 * Google News for "Chris Wood" yeilded about 50 hits. There is a more notable football player by the same name. Cheers, :) Dloh cierekim  22:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC


 * Delete per nom and as possible hoax. The absence of media coverage is particularly suspicious for somebody who supposedly "made American History". EALacey 23:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I can't find verification of anything in this article. --Metropolitan90 02:38, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as not verifiable to reliable sources. What a cool beard the guy has got though...--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 13:58, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Beardopedia. or Dev0. Martijn Hoekstra 15:39, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * It'd be strange if Beardopedia actually existed. It'd have to include Robert Wyatt and Jimbo Wales.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 12:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom's excellent research into the subject. Doctorfluffy 22:59, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.