Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris phelan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was userfy. What do you mean, I should be counting votes instead? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 12:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Chris phelan

 * Apparent vanity page, created by user with same name as subject of the article. Delete. -- The Anome 03:00, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination ERcheck 03:09, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom unless further evidence of notability (besides working for Joi Ito's company) is given.--SarekOfVulcan 03:26, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this vanity page. --DrTorstenHenning 11:43, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or userfy per nomination. Pages like this are generally more like misplaced user pages written as an attempt to have an article. Duh, duh duh:  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  12:43 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy if possible, delete if not. Capitalistroadster 17:27, 19 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.