Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrismukkah (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW keep. BD2412 T 16:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Chrismukkah
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A lot of this is unsourced or talking vaguely about Jews celebrating Christmas. There's otherwise insignificant coverage about the word from an episode in The O.C. (season 1). Insufficient coverage to write an encyclopedic article that meets the general notability guideline. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 02:57, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. I found the following sources, which could be used to expand and verify the article. All of them are either books from well-recognized university presses or news stories from well-recognized organizations. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:47, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: This already is an encyclopedic article. The History section is entirely real-world information about the writing and production of the show, and the influence of the concept. There are decent references in the article already, and then obviously AleatoryPondering has identified more. I don't understand the thinking behind the nomination. — Toughpigs (talk) 02:57, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Easily meets WP:GNG. Tons of available significant coverage:, , , , . Nominator clearly did not do WP:BEFORE (plus it already passed a previous AfD with flying colors) and this is simply an WP:IDONTLIKEIT nomination. Softlavender (talk) 05:20, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep There's clearly very significant coverage about the day, in addition to the above coverage, there are mentions in major sources like The Economist, Nathenson, Cary. "Chrismukkah as Happy Ending?: The Weihnukka Exhibition at the Jewish Museum Berlin as German-Jewish Integration Fantasy." Journal of Jewish Identities, vol. 6 no. 1, 2013, p. 57-69. Project MUSE, doi:10.1353/jji.2013.0005., not to mention a spate of coverage in newspapers as the holiday comes around pretty much every year. This level of sourcing clearly indicates a pass of WP:GNG. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:17, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: the level of coverage meets WP:GNG. Aoba47 (talk) 17:44, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * KEEP Meets the general notability guidelines. Nominator once again refuses to follow WP:BEFORE.  Just click the Google news search for it and look through the results.    D r e a m Focus  14:48, 10 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.