Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrissa Miller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Chrissa Miller

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable beauty pageant winner. She only won the state beauty pageant and did not place in Miss USA 2005. Natg 19 (talk) 01:39, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 01:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Dakota-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 01:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep: Generally speaking the consensus in these AfDs is that the winner of a U.S. state pageant (miss america or miss USA) is notable.  No doubt the 2004/05 archives of the leading North Dakota papers have additional coverage of her; I found a 2008 article on her and added the cite, but their online archives don't appear to go back to 04.--Milowent • hasspoken  04:15, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:30, 28 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (face)  @ 20:29, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per Milowent - RS coverage 3 years after her pageant win is probably a good indicator that the sourcing necessary to prove notability exists (i.e. in 2004/05 publications) even if it isn't immediately available online. --ThaddeusB (talk) 22:03, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.