Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christ's Ambassador Mission


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Christ's Ambassador Mission
The article makes no claim of notability or importance. The number of branches or members is not given, just its mission. No media mentions are given, either. Except for a few words, the entire website is in Korean, so it is not of any help. The name gets 9 Google results when Wikipedia and its mirrors are excluded. Some of the mirrors are non-compliant, so it appears that they are not related, but they actually contain the content of the article, the CAM disambiguation page or fragments of the pages. Also, several answers.com pages (the site is a mirror of Wikipedia and other content) show up because it has a "Blank is mentioned in these AnswerPages:" function where "blank" is a word or phrase that is used in the Wikipedia article. The only useful result in English is this one, but there is no indication that this other organization is in any way related to the one in the article. Some of the Korean results appear to be pages of links, while a couple may have useful information. Given that it is an organization that is supposedly in South Korean college campuses (South Korea is highly "wired"), I would expect and extensive Internet presence if the organization was notable. Unless evidence of notability from reliable sources can be given, the article should be deleted. -- Kjkolb 06:32, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - Less for the ghits (it's a Korean source, and the relevant sources is probably in their crazy moon language) than for the lack of any claim to notability - the article fails to distinguish CAM from a hole in the ground. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 09:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia does not need this, and Kjkolb makes an articulate case. The Crying Orc 18:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.