Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christ-Psychosis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty ■ 08:04, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Christ-Psychosis
The first paragraph says it all: "a relatively new term" found on "web pages including blogs, chat forums and other informational resources". I.e., a neologism that was even invented on a web forum (see this old version) and is also unsourced. It seems to me that a controversial notion such as pathologising religion would need a lot more mainstream and professional usage, and sources, before becoming encyclopaedic. Sandstein 23:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC) Keep: I think that this page explains the term in a clear manner, and is necesary as the only reference that I have been able to find on the term. Besides, I don't see biblical terms being atacked just because they are predominently used by the mentally ill. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.210.189.169 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete, WP is not for something made up in school one day. And if the only sources are "atheist blogs", that's what we have.--Deville (Talk) 00:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Question Is there an existing page on religious belief as a mental illness? Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 01:29, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - results I get on google are non-scientific and not numerous. Wickethewok 09:06, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete neoblogism. Never assume that Google's hit counts are accurate; there are only 26 hits. Gazpacho 19:49, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * If this is the only reference for the term, it's all the more reason to delete it (see WP:V). Sandstein 05:57, 21 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.