Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christ: The Bootleg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Crass. Redirecting as an editorial decision. Consider this a no consensus close. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:01, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Christ: The Bootleg

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Bootlegs are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:35, 18 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:28, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Not sure. Although originally a bootleg, it does appear to have been later released through official channels -- Boing!   said Zebedee  22:15, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Despite it's title, this album (as opposed to the original recording) is not a bootleg - it was legitimately released by two different labels and can be bought from shops such as Amazon. Lack of significant coverage, however, may mean that it isn't sufficiently notable for an article. Google Books suggests that The Story of Crass contains something about it but with no preview it's difficult to say what.--Michig (talk) 06:48, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * undefined — Does Michig have an opinion on the article?  m o n o   04:12, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It probably would have received some coverage (e.g. reviews) when it came out - reviews in print music mags from that time are generally not available online. So it's probably notable, but given that we have little more than a track listing a mention in the Crass article (maybe in the 'Dissolution' section) may suffice.--Michig (talk) 06:00, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.