Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christ jyoti convent school


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. J04n(talk page) 23:42, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Christ jyoti convent school

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a nursery school containing only an infobox BigPimpinBrah (talk) 00:03, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - speedy, except for the fact it is a school. Uberaccount (talk) 03:55, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - No content, per nom. C-Star (talk) 05:11, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 24 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment. This appears to be a K–10 school. Hits found with Google call it a high school. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Indian high school. Has content and is obviously  still  a work  in  progress. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:34, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: I have made some copyedits, tried to add 1—2 sources, added some categories, I can see multiple mentions of their students in Indian newspapers. The article should be moved to Christ Jyoti Convent School, in my opinion (cap)! --Tito Dutta (contact) 17:20, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * There are multiple schools named Christ Jyoti Convent School. Christ Jyoti Convent School, Sultanpur Lodhi may be a better move target. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I very rarely see you commenting at AFD. It is a privilege to talk to an AFD legend. I am honoured. Can you tell me in which other cities schools with same name exist? In Wikipedia the title is redlink! --Tito Dutta (contact) 18:56, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * There is actually  a huge list  in  Google. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:59, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Hm, one in Madhya Pradesh! Missed that! The proposed title looks fine! --Tito Dutta (contact) 19:10, 25 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Query: Would WP:NONPROFIT be the appropriate guideline by which to measure a school? MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:01, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Not really. Although  a guideline, it  has almost  as much  weight  as a policy. Non-profits are no  more exempt from  complying  with notability  standards than  any  other organisations, although  we do, historically, and by  well  established precedent, allow some leeway  for  bona fide K12 (or in  the case of some countries, K10) secondary schools. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:45, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * In that case, what would the appropriate guideline be for a school like this? Would it only be WP:GNG? MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:13, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * 'Keep' - per the long  established precedent as documented at WP:OUTCOMES for bona fide high  schools as stated above. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Well since I have your attention here, one more question...is my understanding correct that general precedent in previous AfDs as shown in that "outcomes" page also form a basis for whether articles are kept or not? Because that would be a very clear indicator in this case. MezzoMezzo (talk) 09:45, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Possibly, but I'm only  a specialist  on  school  articles. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:09, 26 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep and move per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. This school does include the grades of secondary education, so by longstanding consensus and precedent, we should probably keep it. For a move target, I would support Christ Jyoti Convent School, Sultanpur Lodhi. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:43, 31 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - Well established credentials, with 2000 pupils and 70 staff. This is not a fly by night operation. However, the title could be improved.--Zananiri (talk) 10:13, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.