Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christel Miller (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:36, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Christel Miller

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not notable filmaker fails WP:GNG and WP:ENTERTAINER. Lede says she is a filmmaker but has no notable film credits whatsoever. Only sources are Sallyport, her college mag, and ZAMI, a non-RS website. No significant coverage, no multiple sources. First AfD was no consensus. I speculate the voters found her to be "promising." Well, more than a year later and... nothing. I regret AfDing a fellow Bruin, but we're building an encyclopedia, not a yearbook. Lionel (talk) 19:51, 20 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —Lionel (talk) 19:51, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing in the article proves her notability. It claims she is a filmmaker but no actual films are documented to have been made. Google search reveals nothing additional. --Crunch (talk) 04:17, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Crunch. The subject is described as a filmmaker, yet she has no listing in the Internet Movie Database. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:55, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only substance in this article is her undergraduate career. No demonstrable accomplishments, much less impact as a filmmaker. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 15:26, 23 August 2010 (UTC).
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON. While happy to congratulate her on her accomplishements as a student and intern, she has not reached the point where those accomplishments merit inclusion in Wikipedia... failing WP:ENT, WP:GNG, and subsequently WP:BIO.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:43, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.