Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Action Network


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  02:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Christian Action Network

 * – ( View AfD View log )

NON-notable organisation. Fails WP:GNG due to lack of reliable third party sources. Night of the Big Wind talk  19:05, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Here is coverage of CAN at the site of the SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER. Carrite (talk) 20:09, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The group is active in the right wing anti-Muslim movement in the US, per this piece in the Durham Herald-Sun, "9-11 Survivors Appear with the Christian Action Network." Carrite (talk) 20:15, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The group has made a film and attracted conservative Congressional support relating to the So-Called Ground Zero Mosque. Carrite (talk) 20:17, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The group has also become a cause célèbre of the American conservative movement, as this piece in FRONT PAGE MAGAZINE indicates. None of this touches on the organization's earlier activities, which dealt with the anti-gay rights movement. Carrite (talk) 20:22, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The Google News link above lists over 900 articles dealing with Christian Action Network. This is very, very easily over the GNG bar. Whatever concerns with self-sourcing there may be need to be corrected through the normal editing process, not through deletion. Carrite (talk) 20:29, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking up the challenge to improve the article. Let us see if you can convince be to withdraw the nomination. Night of the Big Wind  talk  02:14, 15 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  Logan Talk Contributions 21:31, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per Carrite. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 23:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: passes WP:GNG per sources listed by Carrite. – Lionel (talk) 03:33, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, I know it is not a vote, but I endorse Carrite's line of thinking as well. --Legis (talk - contribs) 01:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.