Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Guitar Resource


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 01:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Christian Guitar Resource

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Clearly fails to meet notability criteria in that it has no indication of significant coverage in multiple third-party sources. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 02:20, 1 January 2010 (UTC) Nom on behalf of the above IP. RMHED (talk) 02:48, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete isn't there a speedy option for this kind of thing? It just goes on about the members of the forum. Handschuh-talk to me 06:09, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes there is but the speedy tag was removed by another editor. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 18:27, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable web forum. The title of the article isn't even right, it's "Resources."   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 15:56, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep it: Members of the forum are working on it. &lt;/post&gt; Geek45 (talk) 00:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The problem is less the quality of the article than the notability of its subject, but you've still got most of a week to see what you can do. My suggestion is you focus on the latter.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 03:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete My brother happens to be Sean.Thomson (mentioned in the article, otherwise I wouldn't even have known this article existed), and he's OK with the article being deleted. He doesn't run the site, but we do have one of mods saying "sure, delete it."  I would like to point out that there doesn't appear to be anything that meets WP:RS standards that indicates it's notability.  No magazines, newspapers, or anything like that mention it, so even if it is the largest Christian guitar tab database, it is technically not notable because noone has written about it.  Pulling up the track record demonstrating that it is the largest and most visited website of its kind would be original research and does not justify the existance of the article by itself.  Ian.thomson (talk) 21:28, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't appear to meet the notability guidelines. As mentioned above, even one of the mods has acknowledged that they don't meet the guidelines and is OK with deletion.   Cocytus   [»talk«]  23:50, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.