Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Independent Alliance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  01:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Christian Independent Alliance
Discussion to run until at least 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable failed candidate and party with no notable campaigning information on line. No notable history of campaigning or electoral history on line. As per Electoral Commission the party has long since been de-registered. doktorb wordsdeeds 20:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for complete lack of notability. Kudos to the nominator for doing the work. Drmies (talk) 21:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete; as it is non-notable, and the article is a very short stub with almost no content. Inferno,   Lord of   Penguins  22:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Consider creating an article on the candidate himself if he has done other things of some note.--EchetusXe (talk) 23:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:N standards. Pastor Theo (talk) 01:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, actual party that contested elections, wikipedia isn't paper. Also noting that the person who created this AfD did not notify the creator of the article. --Soman (talk) 22:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Reply There is nothing on the current AfD page to advise me to notify the creator (I cannot keep up with every change in policy, so if this is new policy, please accept my apologies. Wiki is not paper, but neither should Wiki be a depository for each and every one-time failed candidate or party. We do not accept each and every One Hit Wonder, for example. doktorb wordsdeeds 22:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.