Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian La Torre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep as he passes WP:ATHLETE. пﮟოьεԻ  5  7  21:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Christian La Torre

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Player fails notability at WP:ATHLETE having never played in a fully-professional league/competition Hubschrauber729 (talk) 18:09, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.   — Cliff smith  talk  20:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Jimbo[online] 19:07, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Currently fails WP:ATHLETE. Bláthnaid   talk  19:56, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Changing to keep since Jogurney has shown that La Torre passes WP:ATHLETE. Bláthnaid   talk  21:39, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Barely makes it past CSD A7 as it stands but I'm getting a lot of gnewshits for that name. I may look into this one a bit more. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, can´t see any notability yet. Punkmorten (talk) 21:31, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of notability at present. Artene50 (talk) 07:00, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 11:47, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:47, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - per BDFA.com.ar, he has played 14 times for Sport Boys in the Peruvian Primera (fully professional). I'll take a stab at cleaning up the article. Jogurney (talk) 16:52, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per information provided by Jogurney. Clearly notable with professional appearances. Nfitz (talk) 17:45, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - perhaps this nomination wasn't looked into as thoroughly as it should have. matt91486 (talk) 20:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.