Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Lujan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 23:19, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Christian Lujan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has been tagged for years. I don't see anything in the bibliography or on Google that suggests notability--the requirements in WP:GNG are not met, and I don't think that those in WP:PROF are met either. A PROD was removed, which is fine, but the rationale, "is published author", is not enough for notability per our standards. Drmies (talk) 18:47, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  18:59, 17 September 2014 (UTC)


 * keep - Has appeared as an expert commentator, is a published author, psychoanalyst, psycho-sociologist and professor at ESCP-EAP European School of Management. Zambelo ; talk 19:02, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. 2 million books are now published per year. Writing a couple of books and appearing on a TV show is not sufficient for notability. Also, there is no analysis of this person in secondary sources, which used to be a requirement for an article but it seems is garbage now. Abductive  (reasoning) 23:27, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 18 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete There just isn't substantial coverage in reliable, secondary sources. As noted, writing a book and appearing on TV is not the same thing as being covered in depth by such sources. Also fails WP:PROF and WP:AUTHOR. Nwlaw63 (talk) 00:45, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:N on all counts. -  Cwobeel   (talk)  01:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Dismal citation record (all in the single digits). Does not meet GNG and PROF even less. --Randykitty (talk) 05:48, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet Notability at WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:AUTHOR, WP:PROF or anywhere else I can think of. --Tgeairn (talk) 05:03, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - being published is not only run of the mill, it's what scholars are expected to do at a minimum. Also, he is not listed as a member of the faculty at ESCP, so I can't verify the basic facts in the article. Bearian (talk) 16:14, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: None of the sources provided comes even close to meeting any of our notability guidelines, and my own searches turned up nothing even faintly promising. Not all "published authors" are notable, and there is no indication that this one is. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 18:41, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.