Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Schoyen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Discounting the "keep" by the SPA.  Sandstein  13:46, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Christian_Schoyen
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Self-promotional article, reads like a PR firm wrote it. Is there a standard for notability? Skirts89 (talk) 09:24, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:54, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. There are more than two thousands library holdings of his books: . James500 (talk) 16:48, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:PROMO. Libraries only hold one book he wrote en masse according to the above link, and I can't find any book reviews of that particular title, and his films don't appear notable either. Source-bombed. If kept on some notability loophole, needs massive TNT. SportingFlyer  talk  07:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 00:25, 14 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Full of claims of significance. WorkCat has 8 different works listed, films significant, Vegas Vikings won several film festivals (sources listed in article, and on imdb film made available with all sources, with original TV coverage by all major US networks about the significance of the claims, plus media coverage by newspapers. The film Living the Dream (2006) listed already has own article already with the review by LA Times. Events listed from 2011 to 2015 in article (Introduction of Leif Erikson Day already part of other article ] are of significance and also the content, story line of documentary. Added Social entrepreneurship as all items in article refers to notable community work, even the book, films, only exception is the professional title of headhunter. Toned down “self-promotional element” word "success" in first paragraph to improve article. Take on this is KEEP, unless other valid arguments for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albert1756  (talk • contribs)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Szzuk (talk) 18:57, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:PROMO. Reads like a PR release. I don't think it's notable enough - if it stays, it needs to be totally rewritten from a non-self-promotional POV. Skirts89 (talk) 15:47, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Skirts89, as the nominator, your nomination is already considered as "delete" vote, therefore you cant vote for the second time. However, you can add comments by putting "Comment" instead of "Delete". Thanks --Jay (talk) 16:46, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Ah, thank you I did not know that! Appreciate the heads up. Skirts89 (talk) 18:25, 29 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - Agree with Skirts89 and SportingFlyer. The article is a self-promotional, clearly fails fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG --Jay (talk) 16:39, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Promotional puff-piece created by a WP:SPA.  Amazing it lasted this long.  -- RoySmith (talk) 20:30, 29 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.