Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Stepien (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Christian Stepien
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Note: the prior deletion discussion does pertain to the same person — but this version contains a new claim of notability not present in the original article, so it is not eligible for immediate speedy as a recreation of deleted content. That said, what we have here is still a WP:BLP1E, supported almost entirely by primary sources and an IMDb profile (which is not a reliable source), of a person whose notability consists of having had one of his photographs named to one newspaper's unencyclopedic "best photographs of 2010" listicle — and the source for that claim is not an article about him, but just a glancing namecheck of his existence in the caption to the photograph. This is not enough to get him over our notability standards for photographers, and the sourcing does not pass WP:GNG. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 01:03, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  05:11, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  05:11, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete  fails WP:BIO. As nom says article is reliant on primary sources including his own website . Imdb is not an entirely reliable source. LibStar (talk) 14:59, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete': Fails WP:ARTIST and WP:BLP. Delta13C (talk) 13:57, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.