Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Topics and Virtues

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:23, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Christian Topics and Virtues
(a) So far mainly contains biblical quotes, (b) Seems pretty redundant with Christianity, and possibly other topics, and (c) hopelessly ambitious given the general title Cheese Sandwich 00:45, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete; Selected quotes from any book - however popular - is not encyclopedic in itself | Celcius 01:12, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Cheese Sandwich puts it perfectly. Hopelessly ambitious and redundant to pre-existing articles. I make no claim to being an expert in Christianity, but it would seem to this heathen that the Bible would contain Christian topics and virtues, at which point it would cease to be a WP article and become the Bible itself. Fernando Rizo T/C 01:13, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete (agreeing with the 'heathen') normally I'd cut some slack on a construction site and say 'wait and see' but this is going nowhere fast. --Doc (?) 01:17, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Josh Cherry 01:25, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * DeleteAmren 01:37, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Jaxl | talk 02:27, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete; What anyone needs with an alphabetically organised abridged version of the bible is beyond me but I’m sure its beyond the scope of wikipedia &mdash; FlooK 04:39, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Way too vast and relavent info is already covered by Christianity. &mdash; Linnwood 05:16, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Spaltavian 05:58, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator and FlooK. The title doesn't even describe the article properly; the topics included so far are biblical but not specifically Christian. --Metropolitan90 08:06, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is a list of biblical quotes which don't neccesarily related to the article's title. Wikipedia isn't Wikiquote. Let's have this deleted before the creator puts any more work in it. - Mgm|(talk) 08:28, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Move to another wiki The author has certainly put hard work into this entry. It's not a bad wiki page, just not a good fit for Wikipedia. I encourage the author find a more appropriate wiki for this or to create his/her own wiki.  Hessef 08:54, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, useless and original research. -- Ec5618 09:21, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Move to another wiki, The page is well written and might have better title as a list of..., people have obviously taken time and care over it and it would be a shame to just throw it away. If there's a suitable place in any other wiki I support moving it there. Alf 09:41, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Tekana 11:17, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete We have categories for this. Fornadan (t) 13:06, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * TransWiki, per Alf. Jdhowens90 13:53, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete--KillerChihuahua 13:54, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per mathematics and God. Dunc|&#9786; 14:16, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Move to WikiQuote, perhaps? - ulayiti (talk)  18:55, 22 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, the page is not well written and contains no other material except bible quotes. Either move to wikiquote or delete. --Hurricane111 21:25, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete I see no reason for this page. If it's supposed to be an index to Christian topics as the title suggest, it's not doing a good job of it even as a beginning. TCC (talk) (contribs) 22:42, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, useless original research --tranquileye 14:02:04, 2005-08-26 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.