Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian de la Cortina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Due to lack of participation with no prejudice to a speedy renomination Davewild (talk) 08:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Christian de la Cortina

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a film director and actor, which makes no credible claim to passing WP:CREATIVE and relies entirely on a single reference to a community weekly newspaper (thus not satisfying WP:GNG either.) In addition, the article contains a surprising level of wholly unsourced personal detail (including the names of his parents, wife and kids, until I stripped those as an unsourced WP:BLPNAME violation), intimate and otherwise unverifiable enough that WP:COI editing by someone who knows the subject personally is by far the likeliest explanation. It's certainly possible that he might qualify to keep a well-sourced article, so I'm willing to withdraw this if the sourcing can be substantively improved, but as written this has all the hallmarks of being a promotional piece about a person who aspires to attain notability in the future, rather than an encyclopedia article about a person who's already there. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 19:59, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  TheMesquito  buzz  21:22, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  TheMesquito  buzz  21:22, 7 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment. Here's a 2008 article in  La Presse. --Arxiloxos (talk) 22:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 00:10, 15 March 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 03:09, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.