Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian new religious movement


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 23:33, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Christian new religious movement

 * – ( View AfD View log )

appears to be Neologism and complete WP:OR to boot. Many groups with beliefs and practices derived from Christianity could potentially be classified under this term if it existed outside the confines of Wikipedia. The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 21:07, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Undecided The article talks about various things, all of which seem to be notable. I'm not sure if lumping them together is the best thing to do, but the material should be covered somehow. Jaque Hammer (talk) 21:34, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Is this a POV fork of List of groups referred to as cults or sects in government documents or similar? They use the contents from that article to comprise a large portion of the article.  I, too, am undecided.  While I don't see anything obviously biased, my inner "POV" alarm is going off.  Dennis Brown (talk) 22:33, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Sometimes when you put things together in a group that can give a biased impression. What if there was a "List of controversial people from New York" and included the Son of Sam and Donald Trump? Jaque Hammer (talk) 23:55, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - Seems like an attempt to push a non-notable neologism as a PC term for the vaguely pejorative concept "sect." Carrite (talk) 04:39, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. PC term=POV fork. Bearian (talk) 21:14, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Only commented above, but the more I see it, the more of a pov fork it appears to be. Dennis Brown (talk) 01:51, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.