Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian supremacy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 04:35, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Christian supremacy

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article is a completely unsourced piece on what someone considers to be "Christian supremacy". The borderline worthwhile parts of it are covered in Dominionism. The rest of it is just a laundry list of things about Fundamentalist Christianity that the author disagrees with. For example, did you know that "Christian supremacy" is the reason that we as a society reject scientific inquiry into "child sexuality"? Really? The article makes up two definitions of "Christian supremacy" then simply gives a laundry list of things it thinks probably apply to one of those definitions. I suggest delete this article, then redirect the title to Dominionism, which more than adequately covers the topic and has the added benefit of being an actual term. B (talk) 20:34, 22 June 2010 (UTC) Delete This is pure POV. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 21:14, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete A holdover from Wikipedia's early days when sourcing was considered a bother. I was trying to read the article on Dominionism.  Maybe someone will try to write a version of it in English.  Mandsford 20:54, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Googling finds the term used generically to mean all kinds of things, and there doesn't seem to be any specific subject by that name that would make an encyclopedic article. The current article seems to be too much of an essay, covering a mixed bag of issues loosely connected with the term -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:15, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep but delete most of the content. This definitely refers to a clearly existent historical philosophy, but this article is not a good coverage of it.  Dominionism seems to be mostly a US thing. Andrew Keenan Richardson 00:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Boing! said Zebedee and WP:OR. -- Radagast 3 (talk) 05:40, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as irredeemably WP:POV. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:00, 28 June 2010 (UTC).
 * Delete The article is nothing but one lengthy article of WP:OR and WP:POV.-- Surv1v4l1st (Talk 19:17, 28 June 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.