Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian transhumanism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:58, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Christian transhumanism
Should the article Christian transhumanism be deleted due to its lack of notability? --Loremaster 19:29, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. -- Schaefer (Talk) 08:27, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:53, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Neither of those rationales are useful. What notability criteria are being applied?  How does the subject fail to satisfy them?  Please explain why you think that this article, which cites two references, is unverifiable or original research. Uncle G 12:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete References cited are not reliable sources; the Simon Smith one is a column (columns aren't fact checked in a way to make them reliable sources), the James McLean Ledford one is a personal web page. External links are to advocacy organizations, so again not really reliable sources.  Without reliable sources, despite having had the Original Research tag up until our current nominator removed it, it fails WP:V. GRBerry 02:45, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Someone was playing with words inventing XYZ-transhumanism variants. Pavel Vozenilek 19:33, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * No one was playing with words. Although they are not notable enough to merit a Wikipedia article, there are some individuals and groups who identify themselves as Christians transhumanists. --Loremaster 23:21, 25 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.