Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Baldwin (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 18:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Christina Baldwin
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Non-notable, self-promotion (she is the founder of PeerSpirit; the main contributor is User:PeerSpirit). Important: Although the article Christina Baldwin was deleted, this is apparently a different Baldwin. So that's why it says "Second nomination". CyberGhostface (talk) 17:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as the editor who seconded the prod. Clearly self-promotion. If the author meets WP:BIO, and I'm not sure that she does, this clearly would need to be scraped clean and started anew, with cited sources, preferably by someone with no connection whatsoever to her. There seems too much puffery - and Wikipedia is not a resume service. B.Wind (talk) 18:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete--a resume whose references fail to convince me that this is an encyclopedic subject. There's a little bit of coverage from the St. Paul Pioneer Press, but not enough to warrant inclusion. Drmies (talk) 19:46, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete = Not notable. The few references are mentions in single sentences in larger works about someone else.  The "radio interviews" which have been added are actually podcasts, they're not on the airwaves.  Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 15:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.