Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Lindley (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. A strange one, to be actually kind of close to notable in several different fields. Between this discussion and the previous, though, it seems she's just not there yet per our standards for inclusion. No bias against recreation if better resources that focus on her directly and in depth as her career(s) grow. Keeper |  76  03:16, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Christina Lindley
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm renominating this article as the first debate (in which I voted) ended with a no consensus and only four votes almost two months ago. I think I'm still going to stand by my first vote as it doesn't seem she has gained much attention since then. However, if other users feel this article should be kept, I'm happy to withdraw. I found a recent press release here that says she joined Phil Ivey's (who is notable) team and she has received attention for being part of his team here and two non-English links here (seems to talk about her a bit but nothing that seems notable) and here (minor mention). She has also received coverage in Card Player magazine here, here, here, here, here, here in the past month and a French article here. The cardplayer.com coverage seems to be quite a bit, with one article even calling her "notable", but it's only for participating in tournaments and not winning any notable awards or achievements. Several of the "keep" votes in the first debate were because she has posed in several notable magazines but I argued that there hadn't been substantial coverage about this. She is not notable as a model or an actress but she may have potential poker notability in the future. Notability (poker players) and WikiProject_Poker say a player is notable if they have won a major poker competition, been inducted into the Poker Hall of Fame or have won $1M in a single event and played at Legends of Poker but did not win and was sponsored to play at the World Series of Poker but did not win either. In the previous nomination, I also mentioned that I found this (probably not reliable) that mentioned she was the first woman to win a "WSOP main event" but there wasn't any other evidence to support this. I hope this second renomination can provide a better consensus perhaps from poker experts. SwisterTwister  talk  20:01, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. It doesn't say she won the main event (no woman has yet), only that it's her ambition. Man, she was one BIG baby: "At five-foot nine-inches with green eyes, Lindley was born September 18, 1983 ..." Clarityfiend (talk) 05:53, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Delete nothing notable about her. For the movie she acted in she is not listed in our cast list, so does not appear to have had a notable role.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:03, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - I stripped it and sourced it as best I could. All I can see is PR and PR and PR. She's obviously done some at least borderline notable stuff. Sigh. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing here which meets GNG or WP:NMODEL. None of the sources applied meet IRS, each being a press release. A reasonable search doesn't find anything much better (this 2012 interview was the best I found, and I doubt it meets RS). If at some point in the future this subject gains significant media coverage, then this could be rebuilt, but as of this datestamp, delete. BusterD (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.