Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Axsmith

Christine Axsmith

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Textbook WP:BIO1E. Was in the news for one blog post that got her fired in 2006. No notability as defined in WP:BIO, such as WP:SUSTAINED otherwise. Longhornsg (talk) 23:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Military,  and United States of America. Longhornsg (talk) 23:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. Meets all three criteria of WP:BLP1E. Barely scrapes by GNG either way.  C F A   💬  23:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Pennsylvania,  and Washington, D.C..  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:08, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete based on WP:BIO1E. Axsmith's notability stems from a single incident: her firing following a 2006 blog post. There has yet to be the kind of steady coverage that shows a broader notability. There are also no writings or citations related to her work. Thus, the article does not meet WP:BIO. The lack of sustained coverage or impact in her field supports the case for deletion. It's crucial to remember that this platform's content focuses on subjects that have lasting significance.--AstridMitch (talk) 04:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Seems to be a writer for Daily Kos now, but that's not terribly notable. The firing got into the news cycle almost 20 yrs ago, but nothing since. I don't see sustained notability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:00, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Agree that this is a case of WP:BIO1E due to a lack of sustained coverage. Let&#39;srun (talk) 15:50, 20 July 2024 (UTC)