Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Blasey Ford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closed early per WP:SNOW because the so-far unanimous responses indicate that there is no chance of a consensus to delete emerging, and because this is an article that is being read a lot right now.  Sandstein  06:50, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Christine Blasey Ford

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article created on September 17, 2018. WP:ONEEVENT; does not pass WP:ACADEMIC Openlydialectic (talk) 02:06, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * keep as per WP:RAPID. Too soon to Afd article. Octoberwoodland (talk) 02:23, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not news either. Openlydialectic (talk) 02:30, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep The relevant policy language is at WP:BLP1E, and three conditions must be true for that to apply. One is "If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented." The matter is significant, and her role is substantial and well-documented. This article is in compliance with all applicable policies and guidelines. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  02:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:1E, which states: "If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate." KalHolmann (talk) 02:51, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep detailed source text about her life exists in reliable sources.-- Jayron 32 03:49, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, and SNOW close. Obviously notable. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 03:54, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:SNOWCLOSE – I never heard of that before, but it sure seems to apply here. KalHolmann (talk) 04:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. She's been in the newspapers. Heard them once talking about her on CNN. -Inowen (nlfte) 04:27, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Why is it you think this isn't a valid redirect? Why is deletion the appropriate response here? ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:03, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep & trout the nominator; see for example: Talk:Christine Blasey Ford. Suggest a speedy close. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:13, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:00, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:00, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:03, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:03, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:04, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:04, 25 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. Under "Christine Blasey" on GS passes WP:Prof easily. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:15, 25 September 2018 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.