Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Kane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:14, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Christine Kane

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails the notability guideline for musicians and bands and the general notability guideline due to a lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. De-PROD-ed by along with several others. I was going to bundle these as nearly all of them cite no reliable sources that suggest they pass WP:BAND aside from database-style entries in AllMusic or affiliated sources and were created by the same user, however I am mindful of avoiding a trainwreck so I am nominating each of them individually.  SITH   (talk)   10:51, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   SITH   (talk)   11:19, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:18, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:18, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:19, 23 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - agree, no coverage. Amending my vote to Keep as other editors have found sources.Tacyarg (talk) 13:43, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. There's a reasonably substantial Allmusic bio, and more in Google Books that I can't see enough of to see how much coverage there is. --Michig (talk) 16:30, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: Pretty much every singer and their dog has an AllMusic profile, and significant, independent coverage is almost nonexistent. GN-z11  ☎  ★ 16:54, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep There is significant, independent coverage, and I have already added some to the article. I will try to add more. More information from those sources could also be added. RebeccaGreen (talk) 02:09, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources found by and . Hninthuzar (talk) 12:04, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I cleaned out the puffery and unsourced material. I added cites to her discography. There's enough for GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:10, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes WP:GNG. Legion X (talk) 20:08, 1 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.