Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Sgarlata Chung


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Christine Sgarlata Chung

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article has a claim in it that could be interpreted as meeting WP:PROF. The question is, does being a "co-director" of a law school's associated "Institute for Financial Market Regulation" (a position she shares with another faculty member) suffice to meet WP:PROF criteria? Here and there, I see mentions of her, but no real coverage that's independent. See also Articles for deletion/Edward W. De Barbieri about another law professor article created by the same editor. I'm happy to withdraw this nomination based on the views of other participants. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:47, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Same as the other one. The law school has 400 students and that institute probably has way less. You have to be a president of a large university to pass WP:PROF as a administrative position. Nothing on google scholar. Galobtter (talk) 07:16, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete deans of law schools may in general pass notability (although not for all law schools), and holders of named chairs generally do (depending on how selective such distinctions actually are), but with the massive proliferation of institutes of one kind or another throughout academia, being chair of such an organization does not make someone notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find enough (or any) reviews of her book Business Organizations Law in Focus to convince me of a pass of WP:AUTHOR. Director of an institute within a law school isn't a high-enough level administrative position for WP:PROF. Google scholar shows no widely-cited papers (max citation count 26, single-digit h-index), so the other WP:PROF criteria look out of reach. And web searching for her name finds only social media and scholarly publications, without the in-depth published coverage that would let her be notable through WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.