Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christmas EP (The Fray album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Christmas EP (The Fray album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Only a primary source, no categories. Self released. No reliable sources found. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 01:05, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:35, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. They're a popular globally reknowned band. Every album and EP released by them is likely to be notable. Even if it isn't very good. There will be plenty of refs out there. Szzuk (talk) 18:51, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Every album by a band as popular and notable as The Fray should have an article. The reason it is hard to find sources is because it wasn't a publicly-released album, it was just for members of their fan club. It is also in The Fray's discography article as added by other editors and album artwork was released by The Fray. F orenti talk  05:23, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - The Fray are a popular band and as such all their albums are considered notable. Their discography page mentions this article so an article about it is needed. Shoalla (talk)07:40, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - The Fray are a well known mainstream band and every record they release is notable. As for this particular one, Christmas EP was not a EP they recorded as an original. Just a small free Christmas gift. That's why info is not much but that's no reason to delete the article. It is part of the band's catalog and is still noteworthy. Steed Asprey - 171 (talk) 14:01, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I support the above statements in favor of keeping the page. It is definitely notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prince Imrahil (talk • contribs) 15:02, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I have added a third reference about the EP. And I do feel that the article has to be kept. It is not incomplete or unreferenced. It is not incomplete or unreferenced. All the information that is available about the EP has been added and though it might be small, it is still notable. 115.108.119.202 (talk) 15:15, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.