Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christobelle Grierson-Ryrie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:06, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Christobelle Grierson-Ryrie

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable person who won the competition, fails to find third-party reliable sources. ApprenticeFan talk  contribs 02:21, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * disagreed, third party here-http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/tv/2479361/Top-Model-winner-dishes-the-dirt Hey Boys and Girls (Welcome to the Show…) ° 04:20, 6 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  —Stuartyeates (talk) 09:47, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, fails WP:ENT which covers models. Johnuniq (talk) 10:12, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I would argue that she satisfies WP:ENT as she "Has a large fan base". I can only find one reference to ratings, TV3 Launch Ratings, but the show had consistently high ratings. There has been significant public interest as shown by articles such as Top Model Winner sitting pretty. Certainly not as large a fan base as the winners of the original America's next top model (who, I note, have wikipedia articles, as do the runners-up in that competition), but large enough within New Zealand to warrant an article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.92.107.200 (talk) 23:23, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I think that this article/page should stay on Wikipedia as her fan base is large and is still growing. She will be a success and has yet proven to be successful internationally as a model. I also agree that her fan base may not be as large as ANTM Winners but she will definitely grow more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Missbalenciaga (talk • contribs) 02:41, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I agreethat this is an early stage of her notability, but she is notable and that will only go up. Debresser (talk) 04:00, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, the news coverage by stuff.co.nz and the New Zealand Herald satisfies WP:N, independent and more than trivial. XLerate (talk) 05:13, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, sufficient sources to establish notability. Time will tell whether this is just WP:ONEEVENT or she will be able to make a name for herself.- gadfium 05:29, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.