Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christocephalous


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was rather ambiguous. I count three "deletes" and 2 "merges", which have been given without any reasoning so its borderline. A concern here has been verifiability and another has been notability. This one is a tough one to close, and I know extremely little about the subject, and my attempt at merging will probably be dreadful. Therefore I will simply make this page into a redirect to Autocephaly and leave the history in tact so that anyone may merge it later if appropriate. If the redirect is inappropriate it can be brought to Redirects for deletion. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:04, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Christocephalous
Neologism, (nearly) only present on Wikipedia and mirrors. Please compare: This is one several articles in Category:Christian Church - Synod of Saint Timothy which gives severe doubts about verifiability. See also: Pjacobi 18:52, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * http://www.google.com/search?q=Christocephalous+-wikipedia+-gnu+-gfdl
 * http://www.google.com/search?q=Christocephalous
 * Articles for deletion/Christian Church - Synod of Saint Timothy
 * Delete unverifiable. Dlyons493 19:29, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Verifiable. I'm still not convinced about notability though and hence am leaving my vote unchanged (at least for now) Dlyons493 12:08, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Autocephaly. Tonywalton | Talk 22:19, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Autocephaly.Father Rob Lyons 15:19, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * merge and redirects looks like a poor solution, as long as not a single secondary source (and hardly any primary) can be found. --Pjacobi 21:12, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom chowells
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.