Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christoph Kohl (architect)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Christoph Kohl (architect)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for notability issues for 5 years, article is about an architect who works in a partnership. There's no indication of notable works that can be acscribed to him. Any mention in book publications seems to be about the partnership. This seems to just be an architect doing, erm, architecture with nothing that makes him more than run-of-the-mill. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Time for it to go. Sionk (talk) 20:52, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Sionk (talk) 20:52, 23 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. No reliable sources provide significant coverage of this person. He may have authored some articles and a book (or two) but these are primary sources. He has received passing mention in one journal article. There is nothing remarkable or notable about this person that has been published. For a book to be notable it should be written about or talked about in reliable sources as well, but this might not indicate notoriety for the author - only for the book. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 21:49, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:53, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:54, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:16, 24 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Subject has no significant or wide coverage. Fails WP:BASIC and WP:GNG. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 20:59, 28 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.