Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher 2X


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies.  MBisanz  talk 02:30, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Christopher 2X

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Local activist without any national or regional news coverage. Fails WP:BIO Rogermx (talk) 15:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Rather than diss the nominator for dissing Louisville media and The Courier-Journal, I want to mention the Dequante Hobbs Jr story, which is the story of a seven-year-old boy sitting at his kitchen table eating a meal when a stray bullet struck him fatally in the back of his head.  We see in the WAVE-TV story that Christopher 2X was their source for the story of a sign put up on  a Louisville road in October, for the death in May.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:21, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Changing !vote to Soft delete, because this article needs a champion. Unscintillating (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * That story is about Dequante Hobbs, not Christopher 2X. Also do not see any sources that state Christopher 2X was featured (rather than just mentioned) on First 48, NPR, Dateline, and Frontline.Rogermx (talk) 14:55, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete article is on a living person and lacks any sources. Being a minor source in a TV report is not in any way a sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Then why wasn't it deleted via BLPPROD? Unscintillating (talk) 23:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Durch removed Prod because he said that the article was asserting notability. We are saying there is no proof of notability.Rogermx (talk)
 * You meant User:Gurch, not "Durch". Who is this "we"?  As for "proof", there is no requirement for "proof" in WP:N.  Unscintillating (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I meant Gurch as you so graciously reminded me. You need reliable sources that provide significant coverage of the subject.  Suggest you read WP:NBIO.  Rogermx (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.